| Re: [I] Tale not cancelled, nor sold [message #251009] |
Fr, 07 April 2006 16:35 |
|
Eric Jarvis <web [at] ericjarvis.co.uk> wrote:
> 8'FED dragon [at] netyp.com.au wrote in <e0r4dp$1j0p$1 [at] mud.stack.nl>:
> > And photographs aren't very useful because, when you really get down
> > to it, afp should be a cartoon series, anyway.
>
> If afp was a comic who would you want to script it and draw it?
Goscinny and Uderzo. Ok, who has the time machine this week?
Richard
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Tale not cancelled, nor sold [message #251024 ] |
Fr, 07 April 2006 18:36 |
|
Richard Bos wrote:
> Eric Jarvis <web [at] ericjarvis.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>8'FED dragon [at] netyp.com.au wrote in <e0r4dp$1j0p$1 [at] mud.stack.nl>:
>>
>>>And photographs aren't very useful because, when you really get down
>>>to it, afp should be a cartoon series, anyway.
>>
>>If afp was a comic who would you want to script it and draw it?
>
>
> Goscinny and Uderzo. Ok, who has the time machine this week?
oooh, that would be good.
Although I would have thought it's obvious - Don Rosa, of course!
(Go on, do a special edition AFP cartoon. You know you want to.)
|
|
|
